Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1906-8642
Comparison of Breastfeeding Success by Mode of Delivery
Funding None.

Abstract
Objective This article identifies how mode of delivery and the presence of labor affect the initiation and effectiveness of breastfeeding.
Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of breastfeeding success after vaginal delivery, cesarean section after labor, and scheduled cesarean section in term, singleton deliveries in nulliparous patients at a large academic institution from 2017 to 2018. Exclusion criteria included major postpartum complications requiring admission to the surgical intensive care unit or neonatal intensive care unit, general anesthesia, and major fetal anomalies. Breastfeeding success in the immediate postpartum period, defined as the first 2 to 3 days postpartum prior to hospital discharge, was measured by the presence of breastfeeding, the need for formula supplementation, the average number of breastfeeding sessions per day, the average amount of time spent at each breastfeeding session, the average number of newborn stools and wet diapers produced daily, and the neonatal percentage in weight loss over the first 2 to 3 days of life. Multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to assess the association between mode of delivery and markers of breastfeeding success after adjusting for potential confounders. A Tukey's post hoc analysis with pairwise comparisons was performed to assess differences in breastfeeding outcomes between vaginal delivery, scheduled cesarean section, and cesarean section after labor.
Results A total of 2,966 women met inclusion criteria during the study period, 1,936 (65.3%) of whom underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery, 415 (14.0%) of whom delivered by scheduled cesarean section, and 615 (20.7%) of whom underwent cesarean section after labor. There were significant differences in maternal age, obesity, race/ethnicity, insurance status, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and 1-minute Apgar's score less than 7 between vaginal delivery, scheduled cesarean section, and cesarean section after labor. There were also significant differences between indication for oxytocin, type of anesthesia, and postpartum hemorrhage between the three groups. After controlling for these factors, women who underwent vaginal delivery were more likely to have infants with decreased need for formula supplementation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52–1.93) and were less likely to switch from breast to formula feeding (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.04–1.31) in comparison to women who delivered via cesarean section in labor or scheduled cesarean section. The infants of these women also had an increased number of breastfeeding sessions on average (β = 0.06, p = 0.002), required fewer number of daily formula feedings (β = 0.14, p < 0.001), and experienced a smaller percentage in neonatal weight loss over the first 2 to 3 days of life (β = 0.18, p < 0.001) compared to those born after cesarean section and cesarean section after labor. These women comparatively required less time at each breastfeeding session (β = 0.06, p = 0.005), and produced fewer wet diapers and stools on average (β = 0.12, p < 0.001 and β = 0.12, p < 0.001, respectively). On post hoc analysis with pairwise comparisons, and on separate sensitivity analysis of only women who underwent cesarean delivery, there was no difference in breastfeeding outcome measures between scheduled cesarean section and cesarean section in labor.
Conclusion Women who deliver by cesarean section, despite the presence or absence of labor, are less likely to maintain exclusive breastfeeding postpartum and are more likely to require formula supplementation. These women may need more support with breastfeeding after surgery in order to experience similar benefits for neonatal growth and weight gain.
Key Points
-
Women who deliver by cesarean section are less likely to maintain exclusive breastfeeding.
-
Women who deliver by cesarean section are more likely to require formula supplementation.
-
Women may need more support with breastfeeding after cesarean delivery.
Precis
Women who deliver by cesarean section, despite the presence or absence of labor, are less likely to maintain exclusive breastfeeding postpartum, and are more likely to require formula supplementation.
Note
This abstract was presented as a poster presentation at the ACOG 67th Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting, in Nashville, Tennessee, on May 3, 2019.
Publication History
Received: 30 December 2021
Accepted: 12 July 2022
Accepted Manuscript online:
21 July 2022
Article published online:
21 December 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Kramer MS, Kakuma R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 8 (08) CD003517
- 2 Chung M, Raman G, Trikalinos T, Lau J, Ip S. Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: an evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149 (08) 565-582
- 3 Satcher DS. Department of Health and Human Services blueprint for action on breastfeeding. Public Health Rep 2001; 116 (01) 72-73
- 4 Fituch CC, Palkowetz KH, Goldman AS, Schanler RJ. Concentrations of IL-10 in preterm human milk and in milk from mothers of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93 (11) 1496-1500
- 5 Quigley M, Embleton ND, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7: CD002971
- 6 Quigley MA, Carson C, Sacker A, Kelly Y. Exclusive breastfeeding duration and infant infection. Eur J Clin Nutr 2016; 70 (12) 1420-1427
- 7 Frank NM, Lynch KF, Uusitalo U. et al; TEDDY Study Group. The relationship between breastfeeding and reported respiratory and gastrointestinal infection rates in young children. BMC Pediatr 2019; 19 (01) 339
- 8 Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ. et al; Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016; 387 (10017): 475-490
- 9 Xu L, Lochhead P, Ko Y, Claggett B, Leong RW, Ananthakrishnan AN. Systematic review with meta-analysis: breastfeeding and the risk of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017; 46 (09) 780-789
- 10 Nguyen B, Jin K, Ding D. Breastfeeding and maternal cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017; 12 (11) e0187923
- 11 Martens PJ, Shafer LA, Dean HJ. et al. Breastfeeding initiation associated with reduced incidence of diabetes in mothers and offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (05) 1095-1104
- 12 Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ. et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104 (467) 96-113
- 13 Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG 2016; 123 (05) 745-753
- 14 Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in cesarean section rates: global, regional, and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 2016; 11 (02) e0148343
- 15 Cinquetti M, Colombari AM, Battisti E, Marchetti P, Piacentini G. The influence of type of delivery, skin-to-skin contact and maternal nationality on breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge in a baby-friendly hospital in Italy. Pediatr Med Chir 2019; 41(01):
- 16 Sakalidis VS, Williams TM, Hepworth AR. et al. A comparison of early sucking dynamics during breastfeeding after cesarean section and vaginal birth. Breastfeed Med 2013; 8 (01) 79-85
- 17 Zhang F, Cheng J, Yan S, Wu H, Bai T. Early feeding behaviors and breastfeeding outcomes after cesarean section. Breastfeed Med 2019; 14 (05) 325-333
- 18 Wu Y, Wang Y, Huang J. et al. The association between caesarean delivery and the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study in China. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018; 72 (12) 1644-1654
- 19 Neville MC, Morton J, Umemura S. Lactogenesis. The transition from pregnancy to lactation. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48 (01) 35-52
- 20 Neville MC. Anatomy and physiology of lactation. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48 (01) 13-34
- 21 Hobbs AJ, Mannion CA, McDonald SW, Brockway M, Tough SC. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16: 90
- 22 Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, Hyde MJ. Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95 (05) 1113-1135
- 23 Zanardo V, Svegliado G, Cavallin F. et al. Elective cesarean delivery: does it have a negative effect on breastfeeding?. Birth 2010; 37 (04) 275-279
- 24 Lewallen LP. A review of instruments used to predict early breastfeeding attrition. J Perinat Educ 2006; 15 (01) 26-41
- 25 Tuthill EL, McGrath JM, Graber M, Cusson RM, Young SL. Breastfeeding self-efficacy: a critical review of available instruments. J Hum Lact 2016; 32 (01) 35-45
- 26 Herstad L, Klungsøyr K, Skjærven R. et al. Maternal age and elective cesarean section in a low-risk population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012; 91 (07) 816-823
- 27 Hutton EK, Kornelsen J. Patient-initiated elective cesarean section of nulliparous women in British Columbia, Canada. Birth 2012; 39 (03) 175-182
- 28 Maged AM, El-Semary AM, Marie HM. et al. Effect of maternal obesity on labor induction in postdate pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 298 (01) 45-50
- 29 Lassiter JR, Holliday N, Lewis DF, Mulekar M, Abshire J, Brocato B. Induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix: how does BMI affect success?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (18) 3000-3002
- 30 Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (04) 335-343
- 31 Bushman ET, Thompson N, Gray M. et al. Influence of estimated fetal weight on labor management. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (03) 252-257
- 32 Le Huërou-Luron I, Blat S, Boudry G. Breast- v. formula-feeding: impacts on the digestive tract and immediate and long-term health effects. Nutr Res Rev 2010; 23 (01) 23-36